As a business owner, you need to have an intimate knowledge of your pricing metrics in order to make informed advertising and promotion decisions. To do this, you need to sort and analyze spending details and determine the value of the money spent on product development, advertisements and anything other expenditures that you incur as part of the marketing process.
Understanding your returns on money spent gives you an idea of which products and promotions work well - and which ones don’t. There are many ways to gather information about your investments, but ROI and ROAS tend to be the most important and widely applicable equations for online businesses.
Additionally, the miscalculated formula still provides a useful metric - the breakeven point - which is a meaningful metric for understanding the impact of a variety of marketing costs.
ROI should be used to calculate the costs associated with production of physical product. Because much - if not all - of this process occurs in the tactile world, it deals much in absolutes, which fit conveniently into the formula.
ROI is also useful for calculating multiple expenses and total revenue across multiple product lines and revenue streams. As you’ll see, unlike ROAS, ROI gives you the opportunity to interact with multiple marketing factors at a single time.
Return on Advertising Spend (ROAS) is a metric that interprets the value of money spent on a single advertisement or ad campaign. It is specifically useful for measuring the efficacy of digital ad campaigns. The calculation for ROAS is:
revenue / total spent
For example, let’s assume that you spend $1000 on a Google Adwords campaign that draws in $5000 in revenues. Thus, your ROAS would be (1000 / 5000), or $5.00. Translated, that means that you would earn $5 on every $1 that you invested into the advertising campaign.
(This calculation assumes that you factor only your advertising costs and none of your fixed operation costs, like salaries, rent and web maintenance.)
ROAS is similar to the incorrect miscalculation of ROI, in that it ignores the percentage of a whole and provides a dollar-for-dollar comparison of the revenue generated by a specific ad campaign.
ROI and ROAS are not designed to do the same thing. If they performed the same function, there would hardly be any need for both metrics. Both ROI and ROAS provide meaningful information, if you take the time to understand and implement them correctly.
ROAS is generally considered a cost of doing business - you have to spend money in order to earn it. Businesses with a healthy bottom line can afford to spend more and earn less, in comparison with leaner budgets that require a healthier dollar-for-dollar return on advertising expenditures. So a company with a ROAS of $3 may be in an equally good position as one that has a ROAS of $7, depending on operating expenses and profit margins.
ROI is more of a pattern tracking metric that establishes the value of investment and can instruct the advertising expenditures of the future. ROI views individual parts as a whole, and can even be a way to integrate scattered ROASs to make them into a cohesive whole for dissection and interpretation.
As sales and marketing move from a physical environment to an increasingly online marketplace, it is critical to understand the need for new metrics to monitor company success. ROI has long been a big player in determining product viability and profitability for products and services across the spectrum.
In the increasingly digital age, newer metrics, including ROAS, have risen to steal some of the attention that ROI once wholly commanded. But while these metrics are undoubtedly helpful and valuable, they may lack the cohesiveness that ROI offers.
Regardless, unless online advertising goes the way of the Dodo, ROAS is here to stay. Its value for tracking online ad success is unsurpassed and gives quick feet to marketers who need to understand the marketplace and adjust quickly to the changing tides of consumerism.
So which metric is more valuable for your business and its products? Well, that depends. Both metrics are at least useful, and should not be overlooked. However, one metric in particular stands out for its ability to bundle a variety of expense factors and total revenue into one neat little package: ROI.
Return on Investment gives a straightforward answer to the question of the value of investment against revenues. We can agree that ROAS is valuable, but it only paints a small portion of the whole picture. For companies that operate multiple product lines and advertising campaigns, ROAS must be calculated for every single line and advertisement. This hyper-relevant statistical information is important, but can be overwhelming to continually calculate and re-calculate. Not to mention that ROAS does not stand well on its own, without the support of the information that it represents.
You're now signed up to our newsletter!